OK, two of my friends -- who are nothing alike and have never met -- sent me this video. A week apart. What are you people trying to tell me? And what on earth makes you think I wouldn't? I will admit, the headline is pretty cool. But it's not the first time an old, er, older person has spoken to me like that.
The point is, vote on Tuesday dammit. Don't end up a CNN exclusive. And don't let McPalin win by a vote.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Monday, October 27, 2008
That's My Girl
I knocked on my daughter's door to wake her up around 7:30 one morning last week and there she stood, already dressed, complete with baseball glove on her hand.
A few days before, we had been watching the Red Sox during dinner and somebody slid hard into second. My son said, "He should watch it. He could hurt somebody."
Nina said, "Yeah, like Ty Cobb used to," and went on to explain that Cobb used to sharpen his spikes for just that reason -- to discourage a play when he was stealing a base.
That's my girl.
Sometimes, it's like living with Mini Me. I backed off a little early on, when at age 2 or so she spent as much time arranging her crayons in a very precise, very straight line as she did coloring. I must not have tried hard enough.
Nina's as cynical and sarcastic as they come. Which is saying a lot since she's not quite 10. She constantly rides her brother, correcting and challenging almost every sentence out of the poor kid's mouth. She loves sports and books and animals and exploring. She's fascinated by finding things out, always wanting to learn something new and she gets distracted halfway through a project and moves on to what's next. She'll finish it eventually. She likes games and competing, though she's more interested in beating her brother or her parents than, say, the other soccer team.
In other ways, she is as unlike me as she could possibly be. Not particularly organized. Much more, um, relaxed in the neatness department. She's built like a Russian tennis player. She has her own pace, own agenda, and I'm not quite sure what color the sun is in her world, but I believe it's a happy, girly color like cotton candy pink or a luscious lilac.
Admittedly, these things often want to make me want to scream loudly and rip my hair out. But I know if I did, I'd hear Nina's voice saying, "You know Mom, that's really not a good look for you. But at least it's not gray anymore."
A few days before, we had been watching the Red Sox during dinner and somebody slid hard into second. My son said, "He should watch it. He could hurt somebody."
Nina said, "Yeah, like Ty Cobb used to," and went on to explain that Cobb used to sharpen his spikes for just that reason -- to discourage a play when he was stealing a base.
That's my girl.
Sometimes, it's like living with Mini Me. I backed off a little early on, when at age 2 or so she spent as much time arranging her crayons in a very precise, very straight line as she did coloring. I must not have tried hard enough.
Nina's as cynical and sarcastic as they come. Which is saying a lot since she's not quite 10. She constantly rides her brother, correcting and challenging almost every sentence out of the poor kid's mouth. She loves sports and books and animals and exploring. She's fascinated by finding things out, always wanting to learn something new and she gets distracted halfway through a project and moves on to what's next. She'll finish it eventually. She likes games and competing, though she's more interested in beating her brother or her parents than, say, the other soccer team.
In other ways, she is as unlike me as she could possibly be. Not particularly organized. Much more, um, relaxed in the neatness department. She's built like a Russian tennis player. She has her own pace, own agenda, and I'm not quite sure what color the sun is in her world, but I believe it's a happy, girly color like cotton candy pink or a luscious lilac.
Admittedly, these things often want to make me want to scream loudly and rip my hair out. But I know if I did, I'd hear Nina's voice saying, "You know Mom, that's really not a good look for you. But at least it's not gray anymore."
Friday, October 24, 2008
Read Between the Lines, Pt. II
Apparently, although reading before bed is as good as melatonin, blogging for bed is more like adrenaline.
Almost got up to post this at 2:23 a.m., but thought I'd have a better chance of getting some rest without all the lights and sounds and stimulation.
Never really happened. Instead of relaxing, unwinding and drifting off, couldn't stop thinking about all the writing assignments looming (professional and recreational) and how to approach them. Not. Conducive. To. Sleep.
Rats.
Unfortunately, I should have gotten up in the wee hours to jot down some thoughts, because 9 hours later, I don't really care. I will care again. Eventually. I'll interview a wonderful woman who will talk about her cause, it will be like getting hopped up on sugar and caffeine from a lovely non-fat cinnamon latte and I'll get some writing done.
Then I'll crash. And hopefully sleep.
Soundly.
Almost got up to post this at 2:23 a.m., but thought I'd have a better chance of getting some rest without all the lights and sounds and stimulation.
Never really happened. Instead of relaxing, unwinding and drifting off, couldn't stop thinking about all the writing assignments looming (professional and recreational) and how to approach them. Not. Conducive. To. Sleep.
Rats.
Unfortunately, I should have gotten up in the wee hours to jot down some thoughts, because 9 hours later, I don't really care. I will care again. Eventually. I'll interview a wonderful woman who will talk about her cause, it will be like getting hopped up on sugar and caffeine from a lovely non-fat cinnamon latte and I'll get some writing done.
Then I'll crash. And hopefully sleep.
Soundly.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Read Between the Lines
I am, at the moment, between books and quite honestly, I feel a little naked.
You could say I read a lot. Probably four or five books a month (although the behemoth "Pillars Of The Earth" took almost a month itself). And I'm not one of those people who can read several things at the same time. A book is like a nice, hot bubble bath. You wouldn't put the shower on as well. I like to fully immerse myself in one read at a time.
I'm a little obsessive-compulsive, er, thorough when it comes to what I read too. I'll consume as much as I can on a certain subject (art -- "Michelangelo and the Pope's Ceiling," "Strapless: John Singer Sargent and the Fall of Madam X;" Mormons -- "The Poet and the Murderer," "The Biography of Joseph Smith" "Shattered Dreams," "Under the Banner of Heaven") or by a particular author (Margaret Atwood, Elmore Leonard, Jon Krakauer).
Sometimes I'll pick up those "shoulda" books -- classics we shoulda read in high school or college ("The Iliad," "The Odyssey," "The House of Seven Gables").
When I start to feel a little soft in the head, I go non-fiction ("The Beak of the Finch: The Story of Evolution in Our Time," "The Peabody Sisters: Three Women who Ignited Romanticism"). And when it's time for a mindless escape, Anita Shreve has been popping up a lot lately.
Some might call it escapism. I prefer "quest for knowledge." It also helps me get to sleep at night.
But I just finished "Here If You Need Me," by Kate Braestrup, and the two titles I have on hold at the library haven't come in yet. So here I am, caught with my dustcover down.
It's almost time for Harry Potter again, from the beginning and consecutively, but not quite yet. And sadly, there's nothing in the pile of 14 books next to my bed that really interests me at the moment.
In need of some sort of mental fig leaf, tonight I'm going to give "The Last Expedition" a shot. And hope the library calls soon to say my books are in.
You could say I read a lot. Probably four or five books a month (although the behemoth "Pillars Of The Earth" took almost a month itself). And I'm not one of those people who can read several things at the same time. A book is like a nice, hot bubble bath. You wouldn't put the shower on as well. I like to fully immerse myself in one read at a time.
I'm a little obsessive-compulsive, er, thorough when it comes to what I read too. I'll consume as much as I can on a certain subject (art -- "Michelangelo and the Pope's Ceiling," "Strapless: John Singer Sargent and the Fall of Madam X;" Mormons -- "The Poet and the Murderer," "The Biography of Joseph Smith" "Shattered Dreams," "Under the Banner of Heaven") or by a particular author (Margaret Atwood, Elmore Leonard, Jon Krakauer).
Sometimes I'll pick up those "shoulda" books -- classics we shoulda read in high school or college ("The Iliad," "The Odyssey," "The House of Seven Gables").
When I start to feel a little soft in the head, I go non-fiction ("The Beak of the Finch: The Story of Evolution in Our Time," "The Peabody Sisters: Three Women who Ignited Romanticism"). And when it's time for a mindless escape, Anita Shreve has been popping up a lot lately.
Some might call it escapism. I prefer "quest for knowledge." It also helps me get to sleep at night.
But I just finished "Here If You Need Me," by Kate Braestrup, and the two titles I have on hold at the library haven't come in yet. So here I am, caught with my dustcover down.
It's almost time for Harry Potter again, from the beginning and consecutively, but not quite yet. And sadly, there's nothing in the pile of 14 books next to my bed that really interests me at the moment.
In need of some sort of mental fig leaf, tonight I'm going to give "The Last Expedition" a shot. And hope the library calls soon to say my books are in.
Labels:
authors,
Books,
fiction,
non-fiction,
reading
Monday, October 20, 2008
Hello, My Name Is ...
Maybe we don't need Dale Carnegie's tips on how to win friends and influence people. Maybe we just need a name. And heck, I got one of those!
I got a notification last weekend that Michelle McKenzie had added me as a friend. No, it wasn't some pseudo-psycho way of learning to love myself. It was from a chick with the same name whom I had never heard of before Saturday. Of course, because I practice safe text, I did ask her first if it was a legitimate friend request or something randomly generated.
Turns out, Michelle McKenzie sent friend requests to seven of the 141 Michelle McKenzies you get if you search Facebook. She said she thought it would be funny to see status updates like "Michelle McKenzie is now friends with Michelle McKenzie, Michelle McKenzie and Michelle McKenzie." I and three others accepted the requests.
It was a little disconcerting at first. I logged on Saturday afternoon and my news feed said "Michelle McKenzie is home after a Mt. Diablo hike and is now zeroing in on the subject of this year's NaNoWriMo novel."
My first thought was, "I am? Did I enjoy it?"
My second thought was, "Rats, the little voices are back and now they're coming out my fingers."
My third thought was, "Oh yeah, it's my new friend in California."
Now it's pretty entertaining to scroll through status updates or live feeds and see "Michelle McKenzie is climbing the PathWords ladder" or "Michelle McKenzie has joined the Word Challenge Club," and catch myself thinking "I am?" Then I think, we'll, maybe I should. (But not PathWords because it drives me crazy to see the message "So and so is improving their vocabulary in PathWords." Argh.)
You can learn a lot about yourself by searching your own name on Facebook, or at least get good background material for making stuff up. It looks like there are MMs in almost every state and several other countries. We are ethnically diverse and span a couple generations, me being at the far end of that spectrum. One of us is apparently a serving wench and another is a pirate. Some of us think we look good in bikinis.
Michelle California and I probably have a little more in common than some of the others. We think Yellowstone is one of the most amazing places on this planet. We both write, have a love of language (even if I refuse to climb the PathWords ladder) and are pretty damn funny, sometimes in a twisted sort of way.
Michelle McKenzie is now friends with Michelle McKenzie. And for the record, there are about 17 Dale Carnegies on Facebook.
I got a notification last weekend that Michelle McKenzie had added me as a friend. No, it wasn't some pseudo-psycho way of learning to love myself. It was from a chick with the same name whom I had never heard of before Saturday. Of course, because I practice safe text, I did ask her first if it was a legitimate friend request or something randomly generated.
Turns out, Michelle McKenzie sent friend requests to seven of the 141 Michelle McKenzies you get if you search Facebook. She said she thought it would be funny to see status updates like "Michelle McKenzie is now friends with Michelle McKenzie, Michelle McKenzie and Michelle McKenzie." I and three others accepted the requests.
It was a little disconcerting at first. I logged on Saturday afternoon and my news feed said "Michelle McKenzie is home after a Mt. Diablo hike and is now zeroing in on the subject of this year's NaNoWriMo novel."
My first thought was, "I am? Did I enjoy it?"
My second thought was, "Rats, the little voices are back and now they're coming out my fingers."
My third thought was, "Oh yeah, it's my new friend in California."
Now it's pretty entertaining to scroll through status updates or live feeds and see "Michelle McKenzie is climbing the PathWords ladder" or "Michelle McKenzie has joined the Word Challenge Club," and catch myself thinking "I am?" Then I think, we'll, maybe I should. (But not PathWords because it drives me crazy to see the message "So and so is improving their vocabulary in PathWords." Argh.)
You can learn a lot about yourself by searching your own name on Facebook, or at least get good background material for making stuff up. It looks like there are MMs in almost every state and several other countries. We are ethnically diverse and span a couple generations, me being at the far end of that spectrum. One of us is apparently a serving wench and another is a pirate. Some of us think we look good in bikinis.
Michelle California and I probably have a little more in common than some of the others. We think Yellowstone is one of the most amazing places on this planet. We both write, have a love of language (even if I refuse to climb the PathWords ladder) and are pretty damn funny, sometimes in a twisted sort of way.
Michelle McKenzie is now friends with Michelle McKenzie. And for the record, there are about 17 Dale Carnegies on Facebook.
Labels:
Dale Carnegie,
Facebook,
Michelle McKenzie,
name
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Mental push ups
Saw this article on improving brain function and thought it was interesting.
According to Dr. Bernard Croisile, there are five daily activities you can do to sharpen your cognitive skills. To my female readers, keep in mind it's on the Askmen.com website, so you'll probably need to do two sets of the suggested exercises.
I and just about everyone I know have brain farts. (Sorry, not ready to call them senior moments yet. Besides, I have a 7-year-old boy -- our world is six degrees of separation from farts.) And we'll take all the help we can get to improve memory, attention and ... um, whatever else we use our brains for.
Most of these things I do already, like math in my head while driving. Apparently, it helps strengthen your attention span. It keeps me awake at the wheel.
Of course, it may all be a crock -- one part of the article suggests that these exercises help maintain efficiency when multitasking and it's written for men ...
'Nuf said.
But we could all use some mental push ups or sit ups or pull ups now and then. And if occasionally rearranging my desk, reading a story a day in the science or business section or kicking ass and taking names in the Webkinz World arcade keeps me sharp enough to wear my shirt right side out or give my kids milk money, then I'm all for it.
According to Dr. Bernard Croisile, there are five daily activities you can do to sharpen your cognitive skills. To my female readers, keep in mind it's on the Askmen.com website, so you'll probably need to do two sets of the suggested exercises.
I and just about everyone I know have brain farts. (Sorry, not ready to call them senior moments yet. Besides, I have a 7-year-old boy -- our world is six degrees of separation from farts.) And we'll take all the help we can get to improve memory, attention and ... um, whatever else we use our brains for.
Most of these things I do already, like math in my head while driving. Apparently, it helps strengthen your attention span. It keeps me awake at the wheel.
Of course, it may all be a crock -- one part of the article suggests that these exercises help maintain efficiency when multitasking and it's written for men ...
'Nuf said.
But we could all use some mental push ups or sit ups or pull ups now and then. And if occasionally rearranging my desk, reading a story a day in the science or business section or kicking ass and taking names in the Webkinz World arcade keeps me sharp enough to wear my shirt right side out or give my kids milk money, then I'm all for it.
Labels:
askmen.com,
brain exercises,
neuropsychology,
Webkinz world
Friday, October 10, 2008
Shhh! The Crashing Economy is Really a Secret
A Tom Edsall column on Politico caught my eye this morning (hat tip Mike Allen's Playbook). It questions whether Barack Obama's campaign will be hurt more if he starts changing his upbeat tone to "prepare the electorate for tough times" or fails "to prepare voters for what's coming."
Do these guys really think voters don't know what's coming? And for those who haven't known for oh, say the last year that the economy is sinking faster than a Tim Wakefield knuckle ball, the last 7 to 10 days have made it pretty damn clear. Whether it's via the Internet, the TV news, the newspapers or the big lightboards in Times Square, we been inundated with the image of the U.S. and global economies as gigantic flushing toilets giving all of us one helluva big financial swirly.
We drive less because we have to choose whether to put gas in the car or food on the table. The one thing we do buy is a couple of extra sweaters or sweatshirts because we sure aren't going to put the heat up this winter. Just about everybody is worried about losing his or her job, knowing that golden parachutes are only for those who created this mess in the first place.
Do the pundits and the experts and the candidates themselves really think the people voting for them aren't aware of how bad it's going to get?
Maybe it's because I live in a Blue State and we're better informed. Maybe it's because I live in Taxachusetts, so talk of tax cuts just elicit a knowing nod, the kind you give to the elderly aunt in the nursing home you won't be able to afford next who tells you she once slept with Elvis or the 2-year-old who says she just caught a leprechaun in the back yard. That's a nice story, hon.
The truth is, we're not voting to change the tide, we're voting to stem it. We're voting for the lesser of two evils, for who won't make it worse. Neither man is going to make it better, at least not in the next four years.
And most of us already know that.
Do these guys really think voters don't know what's coming? And for those who haven't known for oh, say the last year that the economy is sinking faster than a Tim Wakefield knuckle ball, the last 7 to 10 days have made it pretty damn clear. Whether it's via the Internet, the TV news, the newspapers or the big lightboards in Times Square, we been inundated with the image of the U.S. and global economies as gigantic flushing toilets giving all of us one helluva big financial swirly.
We drive less because we have to choose whether to put gas in the car or food on the table. The one thing we do buy is a couple of extra sweaters or sweatshirts because we sure aren't going to put the heat up this winter. Just about everybody is worried about losing his or her job, knowing that golden parachutes are only for those who created this mess in the first place.
Do the pundits and the experts and the candidates themselves really think the people voting for them aren't aware of how bad it's going to get?
Maybe it's because I live in a Blue State and we're better informed. Maybe it's because I live in Taxachusetts, so talk of tax cuts just elicit a knowing nod, the kind you give to the elderly aunt in the nursing home you won't be able to afford next who tells you she once slept with Elvis or the 2-year-old who says she just caught a leprechaun in the back yard. That's a nice story, hon.
The truth is, we're not voting to change the tide, we're voting to stem it. We're voting for the lesser of two evils, for who won't make it worse. Neither man is going to make it better, at least not in the next four years.
And most of us already know that.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Blue State,
Economy,
John McCain,
Massachusetts,
Obama,
Politico,
Taxachusetts,
Thomas Edsall
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
